Financial stress is the leading cause in 20-40% of divorces. Two examples of this: 1. One or more parties have bad spending habits and can’t live within their means 2. There isn’t enough money being brought in to afford everyday necessities With that being said, do you think it would be beneficial to have a law that corporations must have BOTH parties in a marriage sign an agreement/contract when it comes to big purchases ($1,000+) or if credit has to be ran?

串文

2024-03-24 23:07

讚

回覆

轉發

作者

Faith Villegas • Beauty • Lifestyle
faithhyyy__

粉絲

218

串文

76+

讚

回覆

轉發

24小時粉絲增長

無資料

互動率

(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數

0.92%

回覆 (BETA)

最先回覆的內容
發文後	用戶	內容
幾秒內	Faith Villegas • Beauty • Lifestyle faithhyyy__	Not in a co-sign type of way. Not one party has more power than the other. But an agreement that as a unit this decision has been made. I feel like this would relieve a lot of avoidance in communication, and force couples to talk and make decisions together. This would remove any surprise spending on unnecessary large purchases that wedge couples apart, as well as credits not taking massive hits just because one or more party wants something, delaying future plans.