The atheist argument of “you believe in 1/5,000, and I believe in 0/5,000 has some fallacy to it. Because there is only 5,000 religions in the sense that humans have conceptualized a finite number of religions. Religions however can be conceptualized infinitely. So it’s more like 0/infinity. Now let’s make the assumption that we could presumably find evidence for god despite the fact that this is technically impossible. The atheist would have to scour the universe infinitely to prove the -

串文

2024-08-23 06:11

讚

回覆

轉發

作者

Justin Chanut
justinchanut

粉絲

串文

52+

讚

回覆

轉發

24小時粉絲增長

無資料

互動率

(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數

NaN%

回覆 (BETA)

最先回覆的內容
發文後	用戶	內容
2 小時內	Andre Spangberg spangbergandre	I don't need to prove anything I don't believe in. No matter how much waffle you put in your post.
3 小時內	Anthony Bof anthobof	We dont have to prove the non-existence of god, you have to prove its existence, thats basic logiciel reasoning.
5 小時內	Stefan Schmitzer stefan_schmitzer	if something is not in the data, it's not in the data. there might be a divine teapot on the other side of the sun, circling it in such a way as to always be invisible from our point of view, but as long as it doesn't influence the data we have, what is there to talk about? – it would be quite idiotic (and precisely akin to the paintings of monsters in uncharted seas in old maps) to assume that anything we CAN'T prove or disprove at any given time to be true.
8 小時內	Luke O'Dwyer lukeistops	Why is it technically impossible to find evidence of any god? Keep going with that thought.
13 小時內	Léo Rabaud-Phuong leorabaud	Are you all braindead ?
13 小時內	里克 0804r__	This sounds like religious psychosis.. I’m sorry but nobody on earth will ever convince me that the arc of Noah really happened.. that story makes literally no sense ..