What’s your thoughts on “YouTubers” doing long term reviews but only having a product for couple weeks-months? Technically in the stock market long term capital gains aren’t a thing until 1 year. VideographersofThreads

串文

2024-09-05 22:45

讚

回覆

轉發

作者

Ben Tinsley
benagins

粉絲

490

串文

111+

讚

回覆

轉發

24小時粉絲增長

無資料

互動率

(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數

0.00%

回覆 (BETA)

最先回覆的內容
發文後	用戶	內容
2 小時內	Bill McLean williambmclean	It’s part of the game, love it or hate it. Personally I’ve been doing more reviews on stuff I’ve used for 6 months plus, or a first thoughts video in the first few weeks and a longer term follow up.
19 小時內	Chris Brockhurst chrisbrockhurst	My policy is geenrally 6 months or more for a long term review
19 小時內	Thomas Kovacik thomaskovacik	I try to do 8-12+ months for long term stuff. If I’m using it heavily I could do 6-12
21 小時內	Kofi Yeboah imkofiyeboah	8 months is usually what’d I’d call a “long term” review, past that if something breaks, it’s usually a sin through my own fault 😅😂
21 小時內	Benj Haisch benjhaisch	gotta be 6 months at a minimum. That's one full wedding season for me and can give quite a bit of insight, but anything less, nah.
一天內	Jason Harris ziibinini	Most things YouTubers do is for engagement, including the stupid "is x camera still good in 2024?" Nonsense. Of course any camera made in the past ~15 years is still good for particular uses.
一天內	Lukas van der Lende lukasvanderlende	I only do longterm reviews of equipment I actually use, so far my longterm reviews have come about a year and a half to two years after initial purchase