Threadser.net
數據
關鍵字
功能建議
Following
Threads
Login
串文
串文鏈結
2024-09-07 16:57
You know the whole “RAW is just sensor data” argument? Well, it’s all just data (even the JPG you upload online is just data). What makes it a photo is printing it out. Everything else is just digital nothingness.
讚
回覆
轉發
作者
David Lugowski
davidlugowskiphoto
粉絲
串文
41+
讚
回覆
轉發
24小時粉絲增長
無資料
互動率
(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數
NaN%
回覆 (BETA)
最先回覆的內容
發文後
用戶
內容
32 分鐘內
tee•AIR•ruh
tiairrabrown
absolutely
4 小時內
Fraser Embrey
fraserembrey
Raw is just sensor data, it's not an argument…that is just a fact. A jpg is data but it's equally valid to display it on a screen as it is to print it out. Outputting to a display also realises the jpg file into an image. Both forms can be lost to nothing in one way or another but at least the digital file can be infinitely copied without loss
一天內
R O Y C E
officialroyce
Who exactly is this comment for? The photographer or the consumer? Among the comments, you mention intrinsic value of a print while claiming digital files hold no value, which incorrect. This isn't yesteryear. We've evolved. Images begin as digital files and therefore are the value. The image itself is the value, not necessarily the state in which it's produced.
一天內
Richard Daugherty
rdaugher2
Agree but disagree. Printing does give you something to hold. But, Digital media is just the new way to distribute and display your work. Whether that’s Threads, someone’s wedding website or MSM. For years I printed my photos at home to show them at work but with so many working remote, media share websites are the only way. I’ve got stacks of prints and albums at home. It’s just clutter…. With digital media, I can save all 280k on a small drive or in my cloud and share them to the world!
一天內
Sean Scheidt
sean_scheidt_photography
Thats an interesting question. Does a screen count as a display medium that “makes a photograph a photograph”? Are some display methods more “valid” than others? A photograph is simply a “light drawing”, right? How it’s displayed has changed historically, from metal, to slides, to various papers with emulsions to ink jet prints. I see no reason to discount a screen as a valid photograph. I mean heck, slides are meant to project. So is a projection not a photograph? Interesting question to raise!