Jurassic Park, not even the return of @samneilltheprop, lauradern and jeffgoldblum could pull it out of the nosedive

Jurassic park was just overdone and the idea of the Dinos across the world is almost an inevitable conclusion (unless someone conducted a nuclear test on the islands). But honestly Indian Jones didn’t need the more recent sequels.

Oh please, Jurassic Park, easily!

Jurassic Park and especially Star Wars.

All of them have bad sequels, Star Wars just has more, and a much louder audience. Personally none of them have been made worse for me, Indy and Star Wars still have fantastic original trilogies. To me I only care about the first Jurassic Park and it’s near perfect.

None, because the originals haven't changed. If there's a film in the franchise I don't like, I'll just not watch it.

Star Wars. Just because of the discourse each time anything comes out, and there is so much more of it.

That's a very loaded question and very pessimistic of you the sequels might be somebody's way into the franchise do you ever think that way instead of just going oh what's rubbish

I’m gonna say JP because I think JP existed in a space where there is a dedicated fandom and casual people are really into it, but the JW trilogy turned average people off. Indiana Jones doesn’t really have a comparable dedicated fan base, people just like them and move on when they didn’t like the sequels. Star Wars is the most divisive, but has the largest dedicated fan base even after the sequels and average people still generally like new Star Wars stuff even if they weren’t crazy abt ST

From Dusk Till Dawn.