Threadser.net
數據
關鍵字
Threads
Login
串文
串文鏈結
2024-09-10 02:17
"Intellectual rot at the NYT .." Lawrence nails it again.
讚
回覆
轉發
作者
Karen Burnes
karen.burnes
粉絲
串文
82+
讚
回覆
轉發
24小時粉絲增長
無資料
互動率
(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數
NaN%
回覆 (BETA)
最先回覆的內容
發文後
用戶
內容
3 小時內
Debbie Dalton
_debbiedalton_
Intellectual rot, indeed. NYT is dead to me.
10 小時內
Beverley Kendall - Author
beverleykendallauthor
Intellectual 🧐 ? I think that’s up for debate
11 小時內
Laura Richardson
yobbybuddy
Corrupt over there- Putin get to them?
11 小時內
Cuauhtémoc Q. Kish
cqkish
LO is the JOURNALIST of the year!
12 小時內
InTheWorld246
intheworld246
Years from now anyone wanting to research our era won’t be able to use the @nytimes as a source, as the Times is not writing about what is actually happening.
13 小時內
Karen
klday12
@nytimes Get it? Or are you too full of yourself to see this?
13 小時內
Penny Watkins
wblnc411
YEP❗️👏👏👏
14 小時內
Madaline Walter
waltermadaline
They all need to take journalism 101 again. Research, verify, multiple sources, accurate definitions of words and concepts. Ding, ding, ding
15 小時內
Bonnie Chalek
bonnynj
Are you listening @nytimes? What happened to my paper?
16 小時內
Tupelo Honey
haygurlhay99
The reporter of that piece was Peter Baker, the paper's top political correspondent, the guy who gets to write the biggest A1 stories, and someone who doesnt vote bc he thinks it makes him seem impartial.