Threadser.net
數據
關鍵字
功能建議
Blog
Following
Threads
Change language
登入
串文
串文鏈結
2024-09-28 05:42
有冇人可以話我知(2)嘅第三行後面嘅 +6k+9-2k-5 點樣嚟😞🙏🏻
讚
回覆
轉發
作者
𝖢𝗁𝖺𝗄 𝖸𝖺𝗇
wc.y_
粉絲
187
串文
97+
讚
回覆
轉發
24小時粉絲增長
無資料
互動率
(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數
0.00%
回覆 (BETA)
最先回覆的內容
發文後
用戶
內容
17 分鐘內
Man sir「DSE 數學 5** 實戰導師」
mans.maths_dse
你第3個= 係要自己夾硬加左-2k-3 係個括號到 你要係後面+返6k +9 先抵銷前邊 而個-2k-5 係本身有
一小時內
Chris HF Tsang
thfchris7345
留意括號內嗰堆嘢,就係要「鬥」一舊 f(k) 出嚟,咁「鬥」完舊嘢就梗係要扣返啲殘渣啦!但整體都要符合返上個 step 先得㗎! 唔好忘記已經假設咗 f(k)=4t。
一小時內
Wyatt Wong
wyattwongtf
6k + 9 -2k - 5 is not actually constructed instead of calculated. In order to prove the formula works when k=k+1, you need to make use of the previous result when when n=kn is true. Since the previous step have already proven f(k) = 3^(k+1) -2k - 3 is true. What you need to do is to construct the first half of the calculation to look EXACTLY as 3^(k+1) -2k - 3 .
一小時內
Littlehei
jasonlittlehei
抵消返多左既野出黎
一小時內
Wyatt Wong
wyattwongtf
It is very common to reuse previous result when you perform calculation. When you deal with calculation or integration properties (most usually involved with trigonometric functions), you will most likely need to applies the result from the previous step.
一小時內
Wyatt Wong
wyattwongtf
But actually the calculation is a bit foolish in my view. When you reach to f(k+1)!= 3(4t) + 4k + 4, you can simply rewrite it as f(k+1) = 4(3t + k + 1) = 4x where x is any positive integer.
一小時內
Ivan
wch.902
矩跳左個stEp 本身係 3*2k+3
3 小時內
Albert Fung
albert_161828
技巧黎,之後你會越黎越多+a-a 乘a除a,之類,睇黎你要操多啲唔同題目
7 小時內
peter_chan_1208
-2=3(-2)+6-2
17 小時內
david
minduction
與其咁樣寫,不如將3^(k+1)寫做4t+2k+3