I live in Massachusetts and I just can’t believe that the restaurant industry here got its way and can continue to underpay front of house staff. I thought my neighbors understood the value of living wages.

串文

2024-11-06 17:09

讚

169

回覆

116

轉發

作者

PuppySpock
puppyspock

粉絲

258

串文

57+

讚

回覆

轉發

24小時粉絲增長

無資料

互動率

(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數

110.47%

回覆 (BETA)

最先回覆的內容
發文後	用戶	內容
15 小時內	Jason Engelhard jay_engels	? You’d rather make minimum wage which is not enough to live on in MA and split all of your tips with your colleagues, than just do your job well to earn larger tips that you can keep for yourself? The latter option seems like it would provide more income. Not to mention you aren’t making minimum wage until 2029, but you’ll still be splitting tips in the mean time.
16 小時內	John bunevith	The front staff overwhelmimgly didn't want this because it would substantially lower their pay. And under the current system they're still guaranteed to make at least minimum wage because if they don't make enough in tips to offset the difference, the restaurant has to make up the difference.
18 小時內	Teagan teagan1989_	I have friends who are servers and they didn’t want more hourly pay bc then they would get less tips 🤦🏼‍♂️ smh
20 小時內	PuppySpock puppyspock	What do folks think of the situation in California? It’s been working out just fine there, FOH workers are earning more. Just curious if anyone is aware of the reality on the ground there.
20 小時內	Steve Leathers steeeve30	I know several service workers. On a busy night , with hard work, they can make $30-$40 per hour. Those days would’ve gone away. They all told me to vote no.
21 小時內	Dillon Fitzgerald db_fitzgerald	As a bartender, every single BARTENDER AND WAITER/WAITRESS GOT OUR WAY! This is overwhelmingly what we wanted.
一天內	Dave DiCenso daveanonymus	Question 5 passing would have lead to servers making less money because they make way more in tips