I can apply that same rational skepticism as you call it to the opposite belief, though. What tangible evidence can you provide to support the belief that God does not exist? You can’t.

串文

2024-12-18 17:24

I can apply that same rational skepticism as you call it to the opposite belief, though. What tangible evidence can you provide to support the belief that God does not exist? You can’t.

讚

0

回覆

7

轉發

作者

Christian Oliveira
boniveira

粉絲

227

串文

257+

讚

回覆

轉發

24小時粉絲增長

無資料

互動率

(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數

3.08%

回覆 (BETA)

最先回覆的內容
發文後	用戶	內容
22 分鐘內	Dave Ellis iceman121982	That’s irrelevant though. Nobody has made that claim in this thread. Atheism is the null hypothesis, which is the only justifiable position when no good evidence exists. You don’t need to absolutely disprove every concept of a god, that’s not what atheism is. Atheism is the position one has when they don’t have a belief a god exists. That’s two very different things. (Continued)
33 分鐘內	mike.hnn	I do have evidence that you do not understand how the burden of proof works...
一小時內	Olivier Pasco opasco	Not believing is literally not a belief…
5 小時內	João Tomaz punkjd	Usually you have to prove that something exists, not the other way around. Should i ask you to prove that unicorns are not real? I bet you can't, so i hope you don't disregard its existance.
5 小時內	Billy Mills billybdemills	I think cancer in children is a pretty compelling argument, you credulous fuckwit.
7 小時內	Alan Ashton alan_w_ashton	This is logically fallacious… but I think you know it. Read up on Bertrand Russell’s tea pot for an explanation of why you’re mistaken.
一天內	Mark & Robert villefrancheparadise	The fact that no concrete evidence exists to support a deity’s existence. Hearsay, faith, legend, evangelical teachings are not evidence.