I assume you will be ending the cap on benefits as well? So if a “rich” person pays three times the OASDI tax then he/she should get three times the benefits, right?

串文

2025-01-01 13:36

I assume you will be ending the cap on benefits as well? So if a “rich” person pays three times the OASDI tax then he/she should get three times the benefits, right?

讚

17

回覆

13

轉發

作者

Dan Iarrapino
capodosto

粉絲

16

串文

33+

讚

回覆

轉發

24小時粉絲增長

無資料

互動率

(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數

187.50%

回覆 (BETA)

最先回覆的內容
發文後	用戶	內容
16 分鐘內	Maggie Mueller-Tyler maggiemuellertyler	My thinking is personal. I had the benefit of elderly members of my family outliving their contribution to SS. My dad lived to 95 but, of course continued to get his SS check until he died. He was a high wage earner and regretted the cap as well. I worked and contributed for 43 years so others could receive their benefit. That is how it works. I was totally ok contributing and would have preferred no cap on my earnings. It was a paltry amount given the tremendous benefit others got.
一小時內	bruceariggs	No.
一小時內	Bobbie Gosnell dancingbeanbob	Wrong.
2 小時內	Kathleen Hahn skyla50	Why when today someone making over 160k cap pays their ‘share’ in 2-6 months then gets a 6.2 or 12.4 ‘bonus’ for the rest of the year but still collects Max benefits as someone who paid in on all their income for the full year??🤷‍♀️
3 小時內	danielbowman2023	No you are rich because the whole system is tilted in your favor. All we want is for you to PAY YOUR OWN FAIR SHARE. Stop using tax dodges and leeching off the government like Elon Musk.
4 小時內	margie.herman.55	That is a good idea.
5 小時內	Joel Samuels samuels8748	Exactly!
5 小時內	Dave Goodman raoul_dork	Why would you think that?
7 小時內	Craig Pittman sleepycp	No.
14 小時內	Paul Zahn belgarath76	No, they should not (and I would benefit from that policy change).