The NYPD chief of patrol has declared a coordinated mass shooting that injured 10 people in New York City is not a terrorist attack. A month ago, shooting ONE person in New York City was considered a terrorist attack. What changed?

串文

2025-01-02 17:48

讚

3,968

回覆

轉發

作者

Mike Pridgen - Weight Loss & Mindset Coach
mikeneedsaplan

粉絲

串文

286+

讚

回覆

轉發

24小時粉絲增長

無資料

互動率

(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數

Infinity%

回覆 (BETA)

最先回覆的內容
發文後	用戶	內容
一小時內	a_lil_hippie_a_lil_hood	And the dead police officers from Jan. 6th were also not considered terrorism. 🤔
3 小時內	Donovon Dildine globaltrickster	Probably about a billion dollars or so
4 小時內	Joseph Martin orangenog	One attack targeted money (terrorism), one attack targeted lives (regular American culture).
11 小時內	⚜️Anne-Marie Noëlle⚜️ flaneuserie	The shooting in Jamaica, Queens was gang related. The club was hosting a private event for a deceased gang member’s birthday & commemoration. Gang-related drive-by shootings are not labeled terrorist attacks because they are not motivated by political or ideological goals, which are central to the definition of terrorism.
16 小時內	Jaimie Mckenzie big_jimbo069	Terrorism is the use of violence for political or ideological reasoning, killing a CEO because you appose their insurance policies is terrorism by definition, what happened in queens was a gang shootout, so by definition is not terrorism