Threadser.net
數據
關鍵字
功能建議
Blog
Following
Threads
Change language
登入
串文
串文鏈結
2025-01-14 05:45
Just curious. The burned-down LA houses, the owners will be compensated by their insurances right? In full? Just cant wrap my head around how a company can pay hundreds if not thousand million-dollar houses.
讚
106
回覆
163
轉發
5
作者
Martin Dominic
martindominic
粉絲
787
串文
244+
讚
回覆
轉發
24小時粉絲增長
無資料
互動率
(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數
34.82%
回覆 (BETA)
最先回覆的內容
發文後
用戶
內容
7 小時內
Isaac Martin Good
sharkbaitdls
They get paid to rebuild the house. The cost to build a new house is a lot less than what many of those were worth, because a huge part of the value was the location and the land and that didn’t go away. Those $1M homes may only cost $200k to rebuild.
10 小時內
Brad Meger
bradmeger
In Canada my insurance company uses app $400 a sq ft to rebuild so my policy is based on that for my 2000sq ft house. Imagine same idea in California. A city near me burnt a few years ago and build just started in 2024. Years later after all the clean up had taken place etc. all new infrastructure was needed etc. the whole town burn.
12 小時內
Alan Teed
moonstruckalan
Andrewlei3 is right. Insurers package all their exposures in a certain area (or all their exposures to a certain peril) then buy reinsurance in layers of 10’s of millions. Whether they bought enough layers for this loss is however a big question. Insurers go bust quite frequently.
13 小時內
vettievettie
Everyone’s insurance premiums worldwide will go up so that the insurance companies can claw back their losses. Everyone, worldwide.
17 小時內
Adam Clements
clemoadam
For every house that burnt down the insurance company would collect 100x that rebuild amount per year from people across the country that never make a single claim in their life. They also only insure the value of the building (and contents), not the land, which is where most of the value is.