Threadser.net
數據
關鍵字
功能建議
Blog
Following
Threads
Change language
登入
串文
串文鏈結
2025-01-14 12:31
Depends,if you were exchanging arguements till that point then yeah, it shows the person just ran out of them and lost
讚
19
回覆
3
轉發
作者
dimitris iordanoy
dimitrisiordanoy
粉絲
16
串文
251+
讚
回覆
轉發
24小時粉絲增長
無資料
互動率
(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數
137.50%
回覆 (BETA)
最先回覆的內容
發文後
用戶
內容
一小時內
Dejon
horsehipscaveman
I think if you’re actual debating them even still sometimes their arguments can be so dumb that you can ad hom haha. Like “what you wrote was so dumb I wanna die.”
一小時內
maurvyn_the_marzipan
No, it shows they were done with the argument. 90% of the time it takes about 3 exchanges to recognize that the other party is not engaging in good faith and aren't capable of reason. There's no point in continuing, so just insult and GTFO. Don't argue with pigeons.
5 小時內
kurodaisliving
No. Someone can still have completely winning arguments and still insult you.