2025-03-15 02:38
so may bagong script nanaman ang dds? 43 lang daw napatay at hindi 30,000. di daw sya considered mass killing at walang resibo ang ICC kung sino sino yung pinatay na 30,000 🥲😭
240
回覆
54
轉發

作者


brandwithmegan
粉絲
串文
6+

回覆

轉發

24小時粉絲增長

無資料

互動率

(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數
Infinity%

回覆 (BETA)

最先回覆的內容
發文後用戶內容
3 小時內
profile
ego runner
ego_runner240
Tama Naman kung totoo Yung 30k dapat 30k nkalagay sa Kasi..di ba lwa is precise and exact bakit sasabihin mo 30k Yung victim pero Yung NASA case 43 lang..bobo pala na abugado Yung ngfile Ng case .
3 小時內
profile
Ronald Kiko Ramos
itsronald.kiko.ramos
Kaya nilang Lasonen ang Utak ng Mga Follower's nila kulang sa Edukasyon. Kaya nga puro Away ang Gusto
4 小時內
profile
Khrit Chayakorn Sethi
setsuna_seiei_
Wow dami nag work sa ICC. Wahahahaha dami expert na naka tira sa kabilang bakod. Lols
7 小時內
profile
Mariela
mariela_kristina
Magbasa sila ng cases na handle ng ICC. Kahit below 42 yung victims may kaso against humanity. Simple lang kasi yan. Di ba hindi lang drug user yung dapat mahuli kundi drug Lords? Kung ikaw ang nag-utos/bigay ng order eh damay ka sa kaso. Yun lang yun.
8 小時內
profile
Dos
itz.dosecuervo
Ito pag kaka intindi ko why only 43 individuals were only mentioned in the ICC hearing. 43 individuals were selected because their cases have clear documentation, witnesses, croncrete proof linking thr killings to a state policy (which is yung WOD Propaganda) yung 30,000 na pinatay are the estimated total victims of the drug war, pero hindi lahat ng cases have enough solid evidence or willing witnesses to meet the ICC’s strict legal standards so the ICC is using these 43 cases as a sample to
10 小時內
profile
Martin Tan
martz27
He's only being tried for those 43 victims, that's the choice of the prosecution because that's enough to send him away for good, also easier to convict with fewer cases
20 小時內
profile
Oragon Po
oragon0228

© 2025 Threadser.net. 版權所有。

Threadser.net 與 Meta Platforms, Inc. 無關,未經其認可、贊助或特別批准。

Threadser.net 也不與 Meta 的"Threads" 產品存在任何關聯。