You’d have enough demand because it’s fairly close to a large metropolitan area anyways, you would be able to build out the infrastructure, housing, and population in that order (which is the order that makes the most sense when you think about it).

串文

2024-09-07 20:54

讚

回覆

轉發

作者

Julian Del Balso
juliothethird

粉絲

123

串文

讚

回覆

轉發

24小時粉絲增長

無資料

互動率

(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數

0.81%

回覆 (BETA)

最先回覆的內容
發文後	用戶	內容
幾秒內	Julian Del Balso juliothethird	Personally I would put all the land on a 125 year leasehold, that way you own all the land underneath the buildings, you get a huge amount of revenue every 125 years, and you can make upgrades every 125 years without buying property out or compensating people, and you can make upgrades and renovations to the city before leasing the land back out.