I said it once and I’ll say it again - the conversation around private jet usage is so useless rn. Why? Bc all aviation - private, commercial, and military- accounts for less than 4% of carbon emissions worldwide. If you want to talk about the biggest criminals for carbon emissions, take a look at fashion (10%) and meat & dairy (14-18% depending on the source).

串文

2025-01-02 15:12

讚

回覆

轉發

作者

stormbornx6

粉絲

串文

27+

讚

回覆

轉發

24小時粉絲增長

無資料

互動率

(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數

NaN%

回覆 (BETA)

最先回覆的內容
發文後	用戶	內容
7 小時內	Nguyễn Minh Quân lilwingflyhigh	This "whataboutism" is regressive in nature as it acts to absolve the sins/environmental impact of the air travel you've mentioned. The biggest criminals as you've listed, serves the average Joe and Jane, and often there's little to no alternatives. i.e. fast fashion is cheap, and meat is an efficient protein source. For private jet use, THERE IS ALWAYS ALTERNATIVES, and you bet they can afford it. Fun fact, more rich people in first/business class subsidize the ticket price for everyone else