The absolutely pedantic hill I will die on is that BTTF isn’t a trilogy. For something to be truly a trilogy, all three parts have to be outlined from the beginning. By that metric, BTTF is a movie with a duology as a sequel. (Parts 2 and 3 were written and filmed back-to-back and it’s obvious.) That said, if 2 and 3 never happened, BTTF would certainly be well remembered, but it wouldn’t be the iconic film it is today.

串文

2025-03-14 16:59

讚

回覆

轉發

作者

Dennis | Dad to the Future
dadtothefuturepod

粉絲

793

串文

101+

讚

回覆

轉發

24小時粉絲增長

無資料

互動率

(讚 + 回覆 + 轉發) / 粉絲數

6.94%

回覆 (BETA)

最先回覆的內容
發文後	用戶	內容
3 小時內	Jonathan Dalecki jonathan_dalecki	BTTF actually connects really well with the Matrix in that sense. If either were written in advance to have following chapters, the creators would have ended the first movies in a very different way. They both have a sense of "our story ends definitively here, but our hero's adventures continue, enjoy imagining them for yourself!" Even the original Star Wars movies have that, if you look at how the movie eventually retitled "A New Hope" ends, because there was no guarantee of a sequel.
8 小時內	Robert rothzell	That is a weird ass take. By that definition no film is a trilogy, except maybe Lord of the Rings. Only because it was based off a book.
9 小時內	Jonathan Harrop jonathansposts	Would Star Wars not be a trilogy then? Lucas whole “I planned it that way!” being obvious nonsense.
21 小時內	Matthew Abel matthewabel	I have a lot of thoughts. 1st - I agree for something to BE a trilogy, it should have am interconnected story. I disagree it has to be fully preplanned. I think BttF works as a trilogy because despite not even intending a sequel at first, they came up with 2 sequels that connect really well.